Field experiment assesses forage quality in brassica, oat, and pea mixtures, suggesting optimal management strategies.
Context Brassica, grass, and legume mixtures can produce high-quality forage but management remains unclear due to the variation amongst brassica cultivars. Aim This experiment assessed the nutritive value and herbage accumulation of fall-grown brassica, oat (Avena sativa L.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) mixtures. Methods A two-year, four-replicate RCBD field experiment was conducted with six brassica cultivars planted with oats and peas. Each combination ofMixes with each brassica cultivar , oats, and peas was were planted at five seeding rates. Forage was harvested twice: approximately two and three months after planting. Key results Turnips (Brassica rapa L.), colza (Brassica napus L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.), and interspecies forage hybrid (Brassica rapa x napus) remained at vegetative growth stage throughout the experiment, and had relatively small differences in nutritive value. When these brassicas were seeded at 1.7-3.4 kg ha–1 with 50-75 kg ha–1 oats and 34-50 kg ha–1 peas they produced an average of 2620 kg dry matter ha–1 with crude protein (CP) of 22.6%, total digestible nutrients (TDN) 64.3%, and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) of 36.2%. Conversely, flowering mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.) saw declines in nutritive value at the later harvest and performed best when seeded at 5.0 kg ha–1 in mixtures (herbage accumulation: 3654 kg dry matter ha–1, CP: 19.7%, TDN: 63.0%, NDF: 39.5%). Conclusions Growth habit of brassicas has a large effects on how cultivars should be managed in forage mixtures. Implications Brassica seeding rates in mixtures should be based on variety growth habit and harvest timing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: