Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals a fragment of a 6th century legal inscription, highlighting imperial influence in municipal matters.
I.Magnesia 359, a fragmentary inscription, is shown to be part of a 6th c. AD report of proceed-ngs, a rare kind of document in Early byzantine legal epigraphy. Numerous parallel texts, notably in papyri and Acts of the Councils, allow a partial restoration of the Magnesia fragment, revealing a dialogue between a representative of the city and a very high ranking magistrate (glo-riosissimus). Several elements emerge from the text thus restored: mention of Mastaura, to the east of Magnesia, whose name is transcribed in Latin script; mention of an imperial rescript granting (to Mastaura?) a reduction of charges; praise of the emperor's benevolence; request addressed to the magistrate to have the imperial rescript read; order given by the magistrate to read the rescript and attach it to the report.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denis Feissel (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: