PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow3 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of two-group IATE coupling with PBE for beyond bubbly flows in a large diameter pipe

View Full Paper
SHSungje HongJSJoshua P. SchlegelSSSubash L. Sharma

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of the two-group interfacial area transport equation coupled with the S-Gamma model for modeling beyond bubbly flow regimes.
  • Implemented the two-group IATE framework within the S-Gamma model.
  • Validated the model against experimental data from Schlegel et al. (2012).
  • Focused on analyzing void fraction and interfacial area concentration distributions.
  • Examined dominant transport mechanisms: bubble interaction, inter-group mass transfer, and volume expansion.
  • 2G IATE improves predictions for void fraction and interfacial area concentration.
  • Accuracy of predictions varies with flow conditions.
  • Bubble interaction is the primary driver for interfacial area concentration variations.
  • Mass transfer effects become significant at higher gas velocities.

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the two-group interfacial area transport equation (2G IATE) coupled with the S-Gamma ( S γ ) population balance equation (PBE) model for beyond bubbly flow regimes in a vertical large-diameter pipe. The 2G IATE framework incorporates intergroup mass transfer mechanisms and is implemented within the S γ model, which assumes a log-normal bubble size distribution. The numerical approach is validated against experimental data from Schlegel et al. (2012), with a focus on the void fraction and interfacial area concentration (IAC) distributions. The results show that 2G IATE improves the predictions of the void fraction and IAC, although its accuracy varies with flow conditions. Dominant transport mechanisms, such as bubble interaction (IM), IAC from mass transfer between group-1 and group-2 bubbles (MT), and volume expansion (VE), are analyzed, revealing that the IM is the primary contributor to IAC variations, whereas MT effects become more significant at higher gas velocities. These findings contribute to the advancement of multiphase flow modeling, with potential applications in nuclear reactor safety, chemical processing, and CFD-based two-phase flow simulations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6984349af1d9ada3c1fb2e07https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-025-0254-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper