Optimizes post-discharge care accessibility and costs in hospitals, suggesting effective partner selection and resource planning.
Background: With the growing emphasis on full-process disease management, efficient post-discharge care has become increasingly critical. Although prior studies have examined follow-up services, resource allocation, and facility location in primary healthcare, model-based optimization of collaborative frameworks between comprehensive hospitals and primary care systems remains limited. Methods: We study a cooperative community hospital selection problem involving contractual cooperation, patient engagement, and follow-up resource allocation. A multi-objective mixed-integer programming model is developed to maximize patient accessibility and minimize total hospital costs, and an NSGA-II-based heuristic is proposed for solution generation. A real-world case study using data from a comprehensive hospital in Chengdu, China, is conducted. Results: The proposed approach produces a Pareto set that quantifies the accessibility–cost trade-off and reveals a knee region with diminishing returns: moderate expansion of cooperating providers substantially improves accessibility, whereas further expansion yields limited additional gains while increasing hospital cost. Sensitivity analyses indicate that cost-related parameters and follow-up frequencies are key drivers of the trade-off. Conclusions: The proposed optimization framework serves as an implementable decision aid for designing hospital–primary care collaboration for post-discharge follow-up: it supports partner selection and capacity planning and indicates levers to improve performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: