This analysis explores differences in democratic decline and autocratization in Central America, suggesting implications for democratic quality.
Central American countries have experienced a persistent decline in the quality of their democracies, including a shift toward authoritarian or even sultanistic regimes. Despite their shared historical trajectories and socio-political experiences, these countries’ paths toward democratic decline and autocratization differ markedly—not only from each other, but also from broader global patterns. Drawing on the concept of contingent consent as a key pillar of inter-elite democratic competition and coexistence, this article analyzes the specific failures of such consent in Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua, and explores how its breakdowns have affected the quality of democracy—leading, in some cases, to its complete collapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kouba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: