Shows reduced ventilatory requirements in severe COPD patients during EBUS, suggesting effective respiratory support.
Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) reduces dead-space ventilation, but this effect is diminished by open-mouth breathing and partial airway obstruction. Consequently, it is uncertain whether HFNC provides respiratory support during endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedures. Methods: A single-center randomized controlled crossover study was conducted at the Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands, from November 2022 to August 2024. Patients with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were evaluated to determine if HFNC reduces dead space ventilation during an EBUS procedure. Exclusion criteria were known neurodegenerative conditions, allergies to propofol or esketamine, pregnancy, upper-airway obstructions, or severe pulmonary hypertension. Subjects received two sequences of HFNC flow (30 and 70 L/min or vice versa) during EBUS. The primary outcome was CO 2 washout, determined by a 60-s capnography trace with and without HFNC flow to measure the difference in inspiratory, end-tidal CO 2 , and β-angle. Results: Twenty subjects with severe COPD (Gold III/IV) were included (Group A n = 10; Group B n = 10), of which one could not complete the bronchial measurements because of an obstructing carcinoma. CO 2 washout at carina was observed at 70 L/min of HFNC flow, demonstrated by a reduced inspiratory CO 2 of mean 6.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.5–8.3, P < .001) and end-tidal CO 2 of 5.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.3–7.5, P = .002), but not at 30 L/min of HFNC flow (mean inspiratory CO 2 difference of 1.5 mm Hg (95% CI: −2.3 to 6.0, P = .69) and mean end-tidal CO 2 difference of 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI: −2.3 to 3.0, P = .35). A flow of 70 L/min reduced inspiratory CO 2 in the left main bronchus (mean = 5.3 mm Hg; 95% CI: 2.3–8.3, P < .001), but not the end-tidal CO 2 (mean = 3.0 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.0–6.0, P = .07). Conclusions: An HFNC flow of 70 L/min reduced dead-space ventilation in subjects with severe COPD undergoing EBUS procedures during deep sedation, suggesting respiratory support during this procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miechels et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: