Investigation reveals improved strength criteria for envelope materials in airships, suggesting enhanced engineering design.
The performance upgrading of stratospheric airships hinges on breakthroughs in the mechanical properties of envelope materials. As a multi-layer composite, the envelope’s load-bearing layer exhibits orthotropic and nonlinear mechanical behaviors owing to its unique structure and manufacturing process. To overcome the limitations of traditional testing methods and classical strength criteria in characterizing envelope materials, this paper presents a systematic investigation of typical airship envelope materials. The classical cruciform biaxial specimen was modified with a double-layer heat-sealed loading arm design to ensure preferential failure of the core region. Combined with digital image correlation (DIC) equipment, tensile tests were conducted under seven warp–weft stress ratios to acquire full-range stress–strain data. A three-dimensional stress–strain response surface was fitted based on the experimental results, and biaxial tensile constitutive models with varying precisions were established. Furthermore, a five-parameter implicit quadratic strength criterion was adopted to characterize the failure envelope of the envelope material. The model was calibrated using five biaxial failure points and independently validated against uniaxial tensile strengths, achieving a prediction error of less than 4%. The criterion’s generalization capability was enhanced through systematic parameterization based on the present test data. This work provides experimental evidence and reliable support for the engineering design and strength prediction of envelope materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: