A global synthesis reveals distinct drivers of soil respiration components in forest and grassland ecosystems, suggesting environmental regulation implications.
As a pivotal component of the global carbon cycle, the spatial variation in soil respiration (Rs) is crucial for forecasting climate change trajectories. Despite extensive research on the spatial patterns of total Rs, the distinct drivers of its two components, heterotrophic respiration (Rh) and autotrophic respiration (Ra), are still not well defined. We compiled a global dataset from studies published between 2007 and 2023 to investigate the drivers of spatial variations in Rs, Ra, and Rh. This dataset comprises 308 annual flux measurements from 172 sites. The results showed that Rh contributed 63% and 60% to Rs in forest and grassland ecosystems, respectively. Further analyses using structural equation modelling (SEM) showed that the spatial variation in Rh and Ra exhibited divergent responses to climatic factors and plant community structure (mostly driven by gross primary production, GPP). Rh was more affected by mean annual temperature (MAT) than by mean annual precipitation (MAP), with standardized total effects of 0.17 (forests) and 0.57 (grasslands) for MAT versus 0.10 and 0.07 for MAP, respectively. In contrast, Ra exhibited greater sensitivity to MAP (0.08 and 0.18) than to MAT (−0.01 and 0.04). GPP exerted biome-specific effects: in forests, high GPP enhanced Rh (0.18) more substantially than Ra (0.08), while in grasslands, elevated GPP significantly increased Ra (0.34) but suppressed Rh (−0.30). Moreover, these variables incorporated into the SEMs accounted for a greater proportion of the variation in Rh and Ra in grasslands (R2 = 0.73 for Rh, 0.48 for Ra) as compared to forests (R2 = 0.21 for Rh, 0.22 for Ra), suggesting the greater complexity in forest soil C dynamics. By using the whole yearly measured soil respiration data around the world, this study highlights the differential environmental regulation of Rh and Ra, providing critical insights into the mechanisms governing Rs variations under climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: