Key result
Rotatable connector enables continuous pacing during CSP in a 50-minute procedure.
Why the study?
Lumenless leads are widely used for conduction system pacing, but sustained real-time pacing and impedance monitoring during lead deployment could enhance procedural control and reduce procedure time.
Does a rotatable connector enable continuous pacing and real-time monitoring during lumenless lead deployment for conduction system pacing in a patient with atrioventricular block?
Case Report (n=1)
Does a rotatable connector enable continuous pacing and real-time monitoring during lumenless lead deployment for conduction system pacing in a patient with atrioventricular block?
The first reported use of a rotatable connector for conduction system pacing with a lumenless lead demonstrated the feasibility of continuous pacing and real-time monitoring during deployment, achieving excellent procedural metrics.
Supports continuous pacing feasibility in conduction system pacing; leaves open need for prospective validation before wider adoption.
Background Conduction system pacing (CSP) is an alternative to right ventricular pacing (RVP), providing more physiological ventricular activation. Current guidelines recommend CSP for patients with an expected ventricular pacing burden >20% and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (1). However, consistent conduction capture is not always achieved, with success rates of around 80% in the MELOS trial (2). Lumenless leads (LL) are widely used for CSP (3), but sustained, real-time pacing and impedance monitoring could enhance procedural control and decrease procedure time (4, 5). The integration of a tool to overcome this limitation was highlighted as a future development in the 2025 EHRA CSP consensus (1). We report the first case using this approach. Case summary An 80-year-old man with paroxysmal complete atrioventricular block and mildly reduced ejection fraction underwent pacemaker implantation. CSP was selected as the pacing strategy according to current recommendations (1). A Medtronic® 3830 LL was delivered via a C315His sheath, connected to a Micropace® Onestim-CRM stimulator through the new rotator connector 5944RL This configuration allowed simultaneous septal penetration and continuous pacing for real-time monitoring of current of injury (COI) and continuous impedance analysis. CSP success criteria were achieved - left ventricular activation time (LVAT) 62ms, broad R’ in V1, ventricular pacing thresholds for CSP 1.3 V @ 0.4ms), fluoroscopy time 4:19 minutes and shorter overall procedure (skin to skin, 50 minutes). Conclusion To our knowledge, this case represents the first reported use of a rotatable connector for CSP lumenless lead deployment, demonstrating the feasibility of continuous pacing with LLs for CSP. Further experience is needed to confirm long-term performance and clinical impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sá et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Paroxysmal complete atrioventricular block and mildly reduced ejection fraction (n=1). Conduction system pacing using a rotatable connector with a lumenless lead was evaluated on CSP success criteria (LVAT, broad R' in V1, ventricular pacing thresholds, fluoroscopy time, overall procedure time). Conduction system pacing using a rotatable connector for lumenless lead deployment was feasible, achieving a left ventricular activation time of 62ms and a total procedure time of 50 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: