PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Foods0 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of Dynamic Changes of Scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) Adductor Muscle and Mantle by Non-Targeted Metabolomics

View Full Paper
DYDi YuDalian Ocean UniversityZYZuoan YuZFZhiyu FuDalian Ocean University

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the dynamic changes of metabolites in scallop tissues during different harvest stages.
  • Employ non-targeted metabolomics to identify metabolites in scallop adductor muscle and mantle.
  • Collect samples during early, middle, and late harvest periods from June to July.
  • Screen metabolites for differential expression between harvest times.
  • Identified 831 metabolites in mantle and 231 in adductor muscle.
  • 24 and 12 significantly differential metabolites were found in mantle and muscle, respectively.
  • Key classes included organic acids, lipids, and organoheterocyclic compounds.

Abstract

A non-targeted metabolomics technique was employed to investigate the dynamic metabolite changes of scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) adductor muscle (SAM) and scallop mantle (SM) during the early (E), middle (M), and late (L) harvest period from June to July. Many more metabolites were identified from SM (831) than from SAM (231), and 24 and 12 significantly differential metabolites were screened, respectively. Organic acids and derivatives, lipids and lipid-like molecules, and organoheterocyclic compounds were the primary metabolite classes in both SAM and SM. In SAM, the levels of most altered metabolites, such as butyryl carnitine, (±)8-HEPE, 14(S)-HDHA, l-Kynurenine, and l-(−)-Methionine), decreased with the extended harvest time, whereas pipecolic acid and oleamide increased. Conversely, in SM, linoleamide, oleamide, dimethyl citrate, kynurenine, and pipecolic acid declined, while 5,6-Dihydrothymidine, dimethylsulfoniopropionate, and 13(S)-HOTrE increased with a longer harvest time. Pipecolic acid, exhibiting an obvious up-regulated response during the whole harvest period, was found to be the sole differential metabolite shared by SAM and SM. Annotation analysis showed that five metabolites were respectively identified in SAM and SM, and these metabolites were separately related to five metabolic pathways with slight differences among the two tissues. Amino acid metabolism/degradation and fatty acid metabolism were the primary pathways. These findings could provide new insights into the dynamic quality changes of scallops during the harvest period and may play a potential guiding role in the aquaculture and harvest of scallops.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6984358ff1d9ada3c1fb4746https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15030526
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploring the mechanisms behind swimming performance limits to ocean warming and acidification in the Atlantic king scallop, Pecten maximus2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Impact of reproductive activity on physiological metabolism and molecular regulation in the Yesso scallops (<i>Mizuhopecten yessoensis</i>)2025
  3. 3Metabolic Response in the Gill Tissue of Juvenile Black-Shelled Pearl Oyster (Pinctada fucata martensii) under Salinity Stress2024 · 13 citations
  4. 4Controlling the quality of <i>Patinopecten yessoensis</i> from the perspective of the ultrasound and ferulic acid influences2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Energy Processes During Rigor Mortis in the Adductor Muscle of the Lion’s Paw Scallop (Nodipecten subnodosus): Effects of Seasonality and Storage Temperature2025