Analyzes shifts in support for authoritarian figures in the Philippines, suggesting changing public sentiments toward leaders.
Over three years after Ferdinand Marcos Jr. won the Philippine presidency by a landslide, attention has shifted from the nostalgia he invoked for the authoritarian rule of his father, Ferdinand Marcos Sr., to the power struggle between the Marcos and Duterte dynasties. The feud upended conventional wisdom about the nature of authoritarian nostalgia. It is no longer simply about yearning for a bygone dictator as support for a more liberal order waned, but has now become competitive between two “democratic” strongmen most longed for in their respective clans’ bailiwicks. It reveals how quickly public longing for a strongman can shift with new forms of historical revisionism and fresh political grievances. Since the Marcos-Duterte “UniTeam” collapsed, growing nostalgia for former President Rodrigo Duterte – magnified by his “kidnapping” to stand trial at the ICC for crimes against humanity – has diminished appreciation for Marcos Sr.'s legacy as support for his son's presidency declined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thompson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: