A critical review highlights AI's role in improving melanoma diagnosis and treatment integration.
Background/Objectives: Melanoma remains one of the most malignant types of skin cancer with rising incidence numbers, despite the progress made in the prevention and management of the disease. Recent technological advancements, such as developments in the field of molecular biology, imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI), have led to a paradigm shift in the diagnosis, assessment, and management of melanoma. The current review aims to integrate current research on melanoma, moving beyond the boundaries of conventional histological analysis. Methods: This is a critical appraisal narrative review that focuses on recent studies in the areas of translation research and digital health with regard to melanoma. This research particularly targeted recent studies within the last five years, with landmark studies implicated when appropriate. Evidence was synthesized within the major categories that include epidemiology, early diagnosis, histopathology, predictive biomarkers, genetic/epigenetic changes, AI-assisted diagnostic platforms, and novel therapeutic platforms & targets. Results: Early detection techniques, innovative imaging, and biomarker-guided risk adjustment can improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostic stratification. The potential of AI in dermoscopy, digital pathology, and decision analytical systems is evident, although validation, bias, and integration issues need to be addressed. Advances in immunotherapy, targeted therapies, and novel molecular/immunological targets are expanding and facilitating integrated and personalized management. Conclusions: There is a trend in melanoma research to shift towards an integrated diagnostic platform that involves the use of AI, molecular characterization, and clinical inputs to enable more accurate and personalized diagnoses. To realize this potential, there is a need to validate, collaborate, and address ethics and implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aksoy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: