Seismic imaging compared multiparameter FWI and conventional processing for fault-related issues, suggesting a faster, more accurate alternative.
Seismic imaging of faulted reservoirs presents a challenging task. Faults cause diffractions which need to be preserved, but their multiples (diffracted multiples) must be attenuated without damaging primaries to avoid a noisy image. Additionally, conventional tomography may not adequately model the complex velocity structure caused by faulting. These fault-related imaging issues were addressed in an offshore Western Australian field covered by a narrow-azimuth streamer dataset, using two strategies. First, conventional seismic data reprocessing was performed with careful noise reduction, and fault-guided tomography. The noise reduction process included detailed surface-related multiple elimination (SRME) model generation and mild pre-migration Radon demultiple. Fault-guided tomography was performed using interpreted faults as a guide for tomography velocity updates. The results showed significant improvements over existing seismic images. Second, a test was performed to leverage multiparameter full waveform inversion (FWI)’s use of the full unprocessed wavefield, including refractions, multiples and intact diffractions, to derive a velocity model and FWI-reflectivity for seismic imaging of faulted reservoirs. The results of multiparameter FWI imaging were comparable, if not superior, to the results from the conventional processing using tomography-based velocity and migration, achieving comparable results in a shorter timeframe. These studies suggest a potential for multiparameter FWI imaging as an alternative, quicker turnaround time solution to conventional processing, for imaging faulted reservoirs accurately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asaka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: