Retrospective analysis validates M1-stage classification in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, suggesting improved prognostic accuracy with PET-based assessments.
Purpose: To validate the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 9th edition M1-stage subdivision for de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (DM-NPC) and explore preliminary evidence for a refined classification using 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-derived metastatic burden. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort of 185 DM-NPC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2022, who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT, was analyzed. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified prognostic cutoffs for metastatic lesions. Survival outcomes were compared between AJCC 9th edition M1 subgroups (M1a: ≤3 lesions; M1b: >3 lesions) and a redefined PET-based classification (Rd-M1a: single-organ, ≤4 lesions; Rd-M1b: >5 lesions or multiorgan). Results: Patients with single-organ metastases and ≤4 lesions showed potentially superior overall survival (OS) (2-y OS: 60.4% vs. 29.0%; 3-y OS: 46.2% vs. 19.6%; P <0.001). Higher metastatic burden (>5 lesions) was independently associated with worse OS (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.24–2.64; P =0.002). The redefined classification suggested better prognostic discrimination than the AJCC 9th edition (C-index: 0.594 vs. 0.562; AUC at 36 mo: 0.649 vs. 0.598). Patients classified as Rd-M1b had a significantly unfavorable OS compared with those in the Rd-M1a group (HR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.39–2.92; P =0.002). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that 18F-FDG PET/CT may enhance M1-stage stratification by quantifying metastatic burden and distribution in patients with DM-NPC, potentially offering improved prognostic accuracy. However, as a single-institution retrospective study, external validation is essential to confirm these observations and guide personalized treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: