Key result
Combined TAVR and EVAR may reduce hospitalization and complications in high-risk AS and AAA.
Why the study?
With an increasing co-occurrence of AS and AAA and few reported combined TAVR and EVAR procedures, clear clinical guidelines and the optimal management approach remain challenging to define.
Does a combined TAVR and EVAR approach improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and concomitant large abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Case Report (n=2)
No
Does a combined TAVR and EVAR approach improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and concomitant large abdominal aortic aneurysm?
A combined TAVR and EVAR approach in a single session is feasible for carefully selected high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm, though vascular complications remain a significant risk.
Should not yet change practice in high-risk AS with AAA; leaves open whether combined TAVR-EVAR reduces events versus staged procedures.
Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the traditional standard of care for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) at high surgical risk, but recently it has been increasingly used for treating patients with intermediate as well as low operative risk. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is generally the first-line strategy for treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) particularly for infrarenal AAAs meeting the anatomical necessary criteria. The association between AS and AAA is increasing due to the increased life expectancy. Only a limited number of combined TAVR and EVAR procedures have been reported in the literature, each utilizing different strategies and device choices tailored to individual patient anatomy and risk profiles. In the absence of clear clinical guidelines, several challenges remain in identifying the optimal management approach for patients with both severe AS and AAA. Objective This paper explores the current trends in the treatment of patients with severe symptomatic AS and concomitant large infrarenal AAA, particularly in those at high surgical risk. We present two representative cases managed with a combined TAVR and EVAR approach, highlighting the procedural advantages and risks and decision-making challenges. The implementation of this innovative, minimally invasive strategy may in some cases significantly reduce both hospitalization time and periprocedural complications. Conclusion With growing clinical experience, this combined approach may evolve into a standard of care for carefully selected high-risk individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dădârlat-Pop et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and concomitant large abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=2). Combined Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) was evaluated on Procedural success and clinical outcomes. A combined TAVR and EVAR approach in a single session is feasible and relatively safe for carefully selected high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and concomitant large aneurysms.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: