Key result
Implementation of a digitally supported multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was associated with shorter total hospital length of stay (adjusted ratio 0.74) compared to conventional care.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of a multicomponent multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway integrated with an information platform for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation was not established.
Does an information platform-based multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program improve functional recovery and reduce hospitalization duration in patients undergoing TAVI?
Observational (n=154)
No
Does an information platform-based multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program improve functional recovery and reduce hospitalization duration in patients undergoing TAVI?
A multidisciplinary ERAS pathway integrated with a digital information platform significantly reduced hospital length of stay and improved postoperative functional recovery and procedural knowledge in TAVI patients.
Aim To evaluate the implementation effectiveness of a multicomponent multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway integrated with an information platform for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Design A single‐center quasi‐experimental study with a non‐concurrent historical control group. Methods A single‐center quasi‐experimental study with a non‐concurrent historical control group included 154 patients. Outcomes were assessed using a study‐specific transcatheter aortic valve implantation knowledge questionnaire, the Fried frailty phenotype, Barthel Index, 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey, 6‐min walk test, left ventricular ejection fraction and hospital length of stay. Between‐group comparisons used independent‐samples t ‐tests, Mann–Whitney U tests and χ 2 tests, as appropriate. Post hoc gamma regression and generalized estimating equations were used in sensitivity analyses addressing measurable temporal differences between treatment periods. Results Patients treated after pathway implementation showed greater procedural knowledge, less postoperative frailty, greater functional independence, shorter hospitalization and more favourable functional and health‐status outcomes. The association with shorter hospitalization persisted after adjustment for measured patient and procedural characteristics, whereas the longitudinal difference in left ventricular systolic function was attenuated after adjustment. Conclusion Implementation of the multicomponent pathway was associated with better functional recovery and shorter hospitalization after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Component‐specific effects and residual temporal confounding cannot be excluded. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care Extending structured education and rehabilitation support from hospital to home may help nurses coordinate recovery and continuity of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Impact This study provides implementation evidence for a digitally supported multidisciplinary recovery pathway after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Reporting Method The study was reported in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs statement. Patient or Public Contribution There was no patient or public contribution to the design, analysis, interpretation, or preparation of this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI (n=154). Information platform-based multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program vs. Conventional nursing care was evaluated on Total hospital length of stay (Adjusted ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.86, p=<0.001). Implementation of a digitally supported multidisciplinary Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was associated with shorter total hospital length of stay (adjusted ratio 0.74) compared to conventional care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: