Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An analysis of focal brain injuries shows distinct neural networks linked to aggression, suggesting different behavioral influences.
Aggressive behavior is prevalent across neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric conditions and is related to poor outcomes. Yet, despite extensive neuroimaging studies, a consistent set of brain networks where dysfunction is consistently related to aggressive behavior remains unclear. Many studies are correlational in nature, while causal studies, such a lesion-location based studies, are often limited to injury of the frontal lobes. Here, we analyze 61 focal brain lesions, identified in the current medical literature, that are associated with new-onset aggression and related behaviors. Lesions were traced onto a standardized brain atlas and used as seeds for a functional connectivity analysis, leveraging resting-state data from 1,000 healthy individuals. These maps, representing likely pre-injury connectivity, were grouped using a data-driven hierarchical clustering approach. Then, the lesion networks of the identified clusters were separately compared to the connectivity of 716 lesions causing other symptoms. This data-driven approach identified two distinct lesion subgroups that both appear to manifest aggression through the co-occurrence of disrupted functional connectivity to networks involved in emotional expression and cognitive control. Both ‘aggression networks’ demonstrated sensitivity and specificity when compared to lesions causing a wide variety of other neuropsychiatric symptoms. The first subgroup network involved connectivity to the anterior cingulate cortex and was correlated with the connectivity of lesions causing akinetic mutism. The second subgroup network involved connectivity to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and contained a notable subset of cases (n = 25) that had reported criminal behavior, supporting a role of self-control in this subgroup and implying separable influences towards criminality within our identified aggression networks. Alterations within the first group aligned with motivation networks, while the second group aligned with disinhibition networks, indicating these as the potential underlying factors in aggression in the two subgroups respectively. This characterization was supported by previous work on the atrophy network mapping of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Overall, this study suggests that aggressive behavior may be more likely after injury to distinct brain networks, which may be related to distinct behavioral factors, and has implications for potential targeted therapeutic interventions such as focused neuromodulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: