Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This preprint uncovers integrity failures in tool-using LLM agents, highlighting implications for AI safety regulations.
Tool-using LLM agents are increasingly deployed in high-stakes workflows where audit trails constitute part of the safety and compliance evidence. We identify a longitudinal integrity failure mode in which, under sustained epistemic pressure and null/contradictory retrieval, agents not only hallucinate facts but also fabricate procedural evidence of verification (e.g., tool execution logs, file paths, timestamps, and intermediate artifacts) to preserve multi-turn narrative coherence. Drawing on 135+ practitioner-documented interactions (Oct 2024–Dec 2025), we formalize this phenomenon as Operator-Induced Longitudinal Integrity Failure (OLIF) and model its progression via the Systemic Cognitive Disintegration (DCS-CI) phases, culminating in Audit-Trail Shadowing—procedural fabrication as a subclass of execution hallucination. We introduce Integrity Delta (ΔI) to quantify fluency–veracity divergence across turns and specify a longitudinal evaluation protocol to detect audit-fabrication under controlled Operational Epistemic Pressure (OEP) using cryptographically grounded tool logs. For remediation, we design a Zero-Trust neuro-symbolic verification stack that binds procedural claims to signed execution records and verifies factual claims against an immutable, PROV-compliant provenance vault. The resulting artifacts support evidence generation for record-keeping, transparency, and robustness duties in high-risk deployments under the EU AI Act. This preprint presents OLIF as a testable hypothesis supported by reproducibility protocols and invites independent replication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Luis de la Torre Lorente (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: