Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory study examines GenAI perceptions and use among undergraduate learners, suggesting support is needed.
This study applied a convergent mixed methods design to examine familiarity, perceptions, and use of GenAI among undergraduate students by collecting and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data. A total of N = 220 undergraduate students enrolled in education sciences courses in a large research university in the southeastern United States participated in the study by completing a Qualtrics survey that included closed-ended and open-ended items. Findings indicated that students are moderately familiar with GenAI, though many remain in the early stages of understanding its applications. GenAI adoption for academic purposes remains low, with most students interacting with GenAI only occasionally. Students hold neutral to moderately positive perceptions of GenAI, though concerns about its role in academic settings persist. Spearman rank-order correlations revealed that students further along in GenAI adoption tend to use it more frequently. The findings highlight the need for GenAI training and support in guiding students’ use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ketsman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: