Key result
Suboptimal OCT stent expansion linked to ~157% higher TVF risk in STEMI.
Why the study?
Does suboptimal stent expansion on OCT increase target vessel failure in STEMI patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=632)
Yes
Does suboptimal stent expansion on OCT increase target vessel failure in STEMI patients undergoing PCI?
Hazard Ratio: 2.57 (95% CI 1.29–5.11)
Absolute Event Rate: 20.4% vs 8.1%
In STEMI patients undergoing OCT-guided PCI, suboptimal stent expansion and minimal stent area are associated with a significantly higher risk of target vessel failure at 1 year.
Background and Aims Although the advantages of intra-coronary imaging guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been reported, the advantage of optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided PCI has not been elucidated in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study assessed the association between OCT findings after stent implantation and 1-year outcomes in an all-comer STEMI population. Methods The ATLAS-OCT trial was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study enrolling STEMI patients within 24 h of symptom onset. OCT-guided PCI was preferred when feasible. This analysis included patients with analysable post-PCI OCT images. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF; all-cause death, target vessel myocardial infarction [TVMI], or target vessel revascularisation [TVR]). OCT images were analysed independently, and outcomes assessed at 12 months. Results Of 632 patients, 439 (69.5%) underwent OCT-guided stenting with final analysable imaging. Mean minimal stent area (MSA) and stent expansion (SE) were 6.21 ± 2.27 mm² and 76.8 ± 15.6%, respectively. Optimisation criteria (MSA > 4.5 mm² and/or SE > 70%) were met in 87.7%. Suboptimal expansion was associated with higher TVF (20.4% vs. 8.1%; HR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.29–5.11), driven by TVMI and TVR. Each 1 mm² MSA decrease and 10% SE reduction increased TVF odds by 23% and 33%, respectively. Minor OCT findings were not significantly associated with outcomes. Conclusion In STEMI, suboptimal MSA and SE determined by OCT were associated with higher adverse event risk. These findings support OCT-guided PCI optimisation to improve outcomes and warrant further evaluation in randomised trials. Study Registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (UMIN-CTR number: 000048590)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yonetsu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=632). Suboptimal stent expansion vs. Optimal stent expansion was evaluated on Target vessel failure (all-cause death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation) (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.29-5.11). Suboptimal stent expansion determined by OCT in STEMI patients was associated with higher target vessel failure at 12 months compared to optimal expansion (20.4% vs. 8.1%; HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.29-5.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: