Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework improves ride-sharing vehicle repositioning, enhancing efficiency and user satisfaction by aligning with human preferences.
Vehicle repositioning is essential for improving efficiency and service quality in ride-sharing platforms, yet existing approaches typically optimize proxy rewards that fail to reflect human-centered preferences such as wait time, service coverage, and unnecessary empty travel. We propose the first two-stage Bilevel Reinforcement Learning (RL) from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework for preference-aligned vehicle repositioning. In Stage 1, a value-based Deep Q-Network (DQN)-RLHF warm start learns an initial preference-aligned reward model and stable reference policy, mitigating the reward-model drift and cold-start instability that arise when applying on-policy RLHF directly. In Stage 2, a Kullback–Leibler (KL)-regularized Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)-RLHF algorithm, equipped with action masking, behavioral-cloning anchoring, and alternating forward–reverse KL, fine-tunes the repositioning policy using either Large Language Model (LLM)-generated or rubric-based preference labels. We develop and compare two coordination schemes, pure alternating (PPO-Alternating) and k-step alternating (PPO-k-step), demonstrating that both yield consistent improvements across all tested arrival scales. Empirically, our framework reduces wait time and empty-mile ratio while improving served rate, without inducing trade-offs or reducing platform profit. These results show that human preference alignment can be stably and effectively incorporated into large-scale ride-sharing repositioning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: