Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gaita examines the impact of a nun’s compassionate interactions with psychiatric patients, suggesting new insights for moral philosophy.
Raimond Gaita’s witness of a nun engaging with patients in the psychiatric hospital where he worked as a student indelibly marked both his life and his philosophising. What he witnessed helped shape for him a conception of “absolute” value, linked to the power of love, which has animated nearly everything he has written in moral philosophy. Much in this conception I find compelling. But I also find some of the ways Gaita has undertaken to articulate the significance of his witness of the nun elusive and/or puzzling. In a spirit of critical collaboration, I revisit some of what Gaita says on that score. By slightly shifting the light at various points, I hope to let some aspects of the scene Gaita depicts show themselves a little differently. At the end I touch briefly on a difference that taking Gaita seriously arguably makes to the way one does moral philosophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Cordner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: