Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Philosophical critique reveals implications of supernatural love on ethics and conscience.
Moral philosophers often feel a need to underpin ethics with a metaphysical or supernatural law or principle, the idea being that would it be only for human beings, there could be no goodness. In this paper, I show the implausibility of this idea, by criticizing the fundamental role I assigned to supernaturality in my PhD thesis The “I”, the “You” and the Soul: an Ethics of Conscience. In this paper, I show how the view laid out in the thesis gives a distorted picture of the meaning of both conscience and love. In the thesis, I claimed that the love in the light of which conscience presents my neighbour “cannot” be my love, as I thought that conscience announces itself even against my will. Instead, I argued that the love that “presents” my neighbour as someone to love is a supernatural love and that our moral task is to respond to that love. In this paper, I show how this account makes nonsense of both conscience and love, by making them impersonal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannes Mikael Nykänen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: