PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

CHA2DS2-VASc vs. CHA2DS2-VA regarding their stroke risk stratifications in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the GLORIA-AF registry

View Full Paper
SLS H M LamGRG F RomitiBCBernadette Corica

Key Result

The CHA2DS2-VA score demonstrated similar predictive ability for thromboembolism compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.641 vs 0.636, p=0.593).

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of CHA2DS2-VA compared to CHA2DS2-VASc in stratifying stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation.
  • Utilized data from the GLORIA-AF Registry Phase III
  • Compared risk stratification abilities of CHA2DS2-VA and CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Analyzed the use of oral anticoagulants in male and female patients
  • Female patients were less likely to receive oral anticoagulants compared to male patients (OR:0.90)
  • No significant difference in ischemic stroke risk between sexes (HR:1.14)
  • Predictive abilities of both scores for thromboembolism were similar (AUC:0.641 vs 0.636)
  • A possible interaction indicated younger female patients may be at higher risk for thromboembolism

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=21,260)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the CHA2DS2-VA score perform similarly to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in stratifying the risk of ischemic stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
21,260 patients with atrial fibrillation from the global, multicenter, prospective GLORIA-AF Registry Phase III.
E
Exposure
CHA2DS2-VA score
C
Comparator
CHA2DS2-VASc score
O
Outcome
Risk of ischemic stroke and thromboembolism (TE)hard clinical

The sex-independent CHA2DS2-VA score has similar predictive performance for thromboembolic events compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.641% vs 0.636%

p-value: p=0.593

Abstract

Abstract Background Whether the adoption of CHA2DS2-VA score, the sex-independent version of the CHA2DS2-VASc score is beneficial for stratifying risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. Purpose To compare CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VA in terms of thromboembolic risk stratification. Methods Utilising the data from the global, multicentre and prospective GLORIA-AF Registry Phase III, we compared the performances of CHA2DS2-VA and CHA2DS2-VASc in stratifying the risk of ischemic stroke and thromboembolism (TE) and compared the risk of ischemic stroke and TE, and second, the use of oral anticoagulants between male and female patients with AF. Results A total of 21,260 AF patients with available data were included in the analysis (Age: mean ± SD, 70.2±10.3 years, 44.9% Female). Overall, female patients were less likely prescribed with OAC compared to males (OR:0.90, 95%CI: 0.83-0.97). A significant interaction (p0.001) between sex and age was observed, with a lower likelihood of receiving OAC among younger female patients (Figure 1). The risk of ischemic stroke (HR:1.14, 95%CI: 0.85-1.53) and TE (HR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.82-1.26) was similar between male and female patients. The predictive ability of the two scores was similar for both outcomes: TE (AUC:0.641, 95%CI: 0.585-0.697 vs AUC:0.636, 95%CI: 0.580-0.692; p=0.593) and ischemic stroke (AUC:0.660, 95%CI: 0.582-0.739 vs AUC:0.646, 95%CI: 0.568-0.725; p=0.847) (Figure 2). There was a possible interaction between sex and age observed, with a higher risk of TE in younger female patients (p=0.051) (Figure 1). Conclusions CHA2DS2-VA score had similar overall predictive performance for thromboembolic events compared to CHA2DS2-VASc score. The role of female sex in the management and outcomes of patients with AF may differ according to age, with a higher risk of TE in younger female patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lam et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in atrial fibrillation (n=21,260). CHA2DS2-VA score vs. CHA2DS2-VASc score was evaluated on predictive ability for thromboembolism (TE) (p=0.593). The CHA2DS2-VA score demonstrated similar predictive ability for thromboembolism compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.641 vs 0.636, p=0.593).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6985852f8f7c464f2300852dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.505
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stroke risk stratifications according to CHA2DS2-VASc vs. CHA2DS2-VA in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the GLORIA-AF registry2025 · 11 citations
  2. 2Comparing CHA2DS2-VA and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation: a temporal trends analysis from the retrospective Finnish AntiCoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation (FinACAF) cohort2024 · 103 citations
  3. 3Review of the CHA₂DS₂-VA Score2026
  4. 4Stroke risk of females versus males in asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a temporal trend analysis and a comparison of the CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VA stroke risk stratification scores2025
  5. 5Atrial fibrillation and female sex: use of oral anticoagulants in a large European cohort and residual risk of thromboembolism and stroke2025 · 19 citations