PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes19 citations

Atrial fibrillation and female sex: use of oral anticoagulants in a large European cohort and residual risk of thromboembolism and stroke

View Full Paper
DMDavide Antonio MeiGRGiulio Francesco RomitiMVMarco Vitolo

Key Points

  • Women in the study showed a higher burden of comorbidities yet were less likely to receive oral anticoagulants than men.
  • Thromboembolism events occurred at higher rates in women treated with anticoagulants compared to men, indicating gender differences in risk.
  • The CHA₂DS₂-VA and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores had comparable predictive performance, though CHA₂DS₂-VA showed worse reclassification.
  • After adjusting for confounders, female sex was not significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke or thromboembolism.

Abstract

Abstract Background The role of female sex in stroke risk and oral anticoagulant (OAC) use in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. This study evaluates sex-specific differences in OAC prescription, residual risk of stroke/TIA and thromboembolism (STE), and the predictive performance of CHA₂DS₂-VASc vs. CHA₂DS₂-VA scores. Methods We analyzed data from a European prospective cohort. The association between female sex and OAC prescription was assessed in patients with CHA₂DS₂-VA score ≥1. We analyzed the residual STE risk in OAC-treated patients and compared the predictive performance of CHA₂DS₂-VASc and CHA₂DS₂-VA scores. Results Among 10,080 patients (41.8% women; mean age 69.7 SD 10.7 years) with CHA₂DS₂-VA ≥1, women had higher burden of comorbidities and less likely to receive OACs than men (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69–0.90). In OAC-treated patients, STE rates were higher in women (IR 1.33 vs. 0.94 per 100 person-years). After adjusting for confounders and the competing risk of death, female sex was not statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of STE (sHR 1.24, 95% CI 0.89–1.74, P=0.210). CHA₂DS₂-VA and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores had similar predictive performance (AUC 0.603 vs. 0.605, P=0.665). CHA₂DS₂-VA showed worse (ie. negative) reclassification compared to CHA₂DS₂-VASc (net reclassification index -0.088, 95% CI -0.164 to -0.001), with no significant differences in discrimination or net benefit. Conclusions In AF patients treated with OAC, the increased residual risk of STE associated with female sex was non-significant after adjusting for confounders and the competing risk of death. Both scores had similar predictive performance but CHA₂DS₂-VA showed worse reclassification compared to CHA₂DS₂-VASc.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mei et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c19f7f54b1d3bfb60dad42https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf075
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Stroke risk stratifications according to CHA2DS2-VASc vs. CHA2DS2-VA in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the GLORIA-AF registry2025 · 11 citations
  2. 2Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond2007 · 6,483 citations
  3. 3Ischaemic stroke in women with atrial fibrillation: temporal trends and clinical implications2024 · 62 citations
  4. 4Sex Differences in Oral Anticoagulation and Outcomes of Stroke and Intracranial Bleeding in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation2020 · 84 citations
  5. 5Female Sex Is a Risk Modifier Rather Than a Risk Factor for Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation2018 · 253 citations