Qualitative analysis explores ethical decision-making in nurses, indicating significant religious and legal influences.
Background Ethical decision-making was a major challenge for healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in contexts where religion and law strongly influence clinical practice. Both deontological and consequentialist ethical frameworks guide medical decisions; however, balancing these approaches is especially difficult during crises. Objective This study aimed to explore the ethical decision-making experiences of intensive care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic within a Muslim community in Iran. Materials and Methods A qualitative content analysis was conducted based on in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 14 intensive care nurses. Results Three main themes emerged: (a) Humanitarian commitment involving actions beyond formal duties; (b) Nursing practice influenced by legal and organizational frameworks; and (c) Application of a consequentialist perspective in decision-making. Nurses described acting ethically under legal constraints, sometimes prioritizing patients’ welfare when physicians were unavailable, and balancing religious, ethical, and legal considerations in their practice. Conclusion Nurses’ ethical decision-making was shaped by both professional and contextual factors, including law, religion, and cultural values. Their actions reflected a balance between deontological and consequentialist ethics rather than strict adherence to rigid legal or institutional rules. The findings highlight the need for context-sensitive ethical guidelines and support systems for nurses working under crisis conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: