Key result
Early sacubitril/valsartan initiation after acute heart failure significantly improved LV end-diastolic volume index compared to RAS inhibitors (mean difference -5.1 mL/m²; 95% CI -10.2 to -0.04; P=0.047).
Why the study?
The effect of early in-hospital sacubitril/valsartan initiation on echocardiographic parameters and left ventricular reverse remodeling in stabilized patients after acute heart failure remained unknown.
Does early in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan improve left ventricular reverse remodeling compared to RAS inhibitors in stabilized patients after acute heart failure?
RCT (n=206)
open-label
randomized
Yes
Does early in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan improve left ventricular reverse remodeling compared to RAS inhibitors in stabilized patients after acute heart failure?
Early in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan significantly improves left ventricular reverse remodeling at 8 weeks compared to RAS inhibitors in stabilized patients after acute heart failure, particularly those with LVEF < 40%.
Supports early sacubitril/valsartan initiation after acute HF stabilization; extends prior NT-proBNP data to 8-week echocardiographic remodeling in LVEF <40%.
Background In the PREMIER study, early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) led to a greater reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels over 8 weeks compared to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in stabilized patients after acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization. However, the effect of this treatment on echocardiographic parameters remains unknown. Purpose In this post-hoc sub-study of the PREMIER trial, we sought to evaluate the treatment effects of Sac/Val on left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling in stabilized patients after AHF. Methods The PREMIER study was a physician-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial enrolling stabilized Japanese inpatients after AHF. This sub-study compared the changes from baseline echocardiographic parameters at 8 weeks between patients treated with Sac/Val and RAS inhibitors. Results Among the full analysis set of the PREMIER study, this analysis included 206 patients (mean age 73 years; 64 females [31.1%]), who had echocardiographic data (Figure 1). The Sac/Val group (n=94) significantly improved LV functional and morphological parameters at 8 weeks (Figure 2). Compared with the control group (n=112), preload-dependent parameters improved significantly, including LV end-diastolic volume index (mean: −5.1 mL/m²; 95% CI: −10.2 to −0.04; p = 0.047) and tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity (mean: −0.17 m/s; 95% CI: −0.31 to −0.03; p = 0.016). In a subgroup analysis stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the reverse remodeling effect was primarily observed in patients with LVEF < 40%. Conclusions Early Sac/Val initiation after AHF hospitalization significantly improved LV function and morphology, particularly in patients with LVEF < 40%, supporting its role in LV reverse remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in acute heart failure (n=206). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors was evaluated on Change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index at 8 weeks (MD -5.1 mL/m², 95% CI -10.2 to -0.04, p=0.047). Early sacubitril/valsartan initiation after acute heart failure significantly improved LV end-diastolic volume index compared to RAS inhibitors (mean difference -5.1 mL/m²; 95% CI -10.2 to -0.04; P=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: