PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Strategy Science2 citations

AI-Augmented Strategic Decision-Making Under Time Constraints: An Experimental Study on Mental Representations and Strategic Foresight

View Full Paper
TKTim KanisJMJustus Emanuel MannJSJutta Stumpf-Wollersheim

Key Points

  • This research investigates how time constraints and large language models influence mental representations and strategic foresight.
  • Conducted a 2 × 2 experimental design with 348 participants in a startup evaluation task
  • Analyzed the effects of time constraints and LLM use on mental representations
  • Evaluated the impact on strategic foresight and cognitive outcomes
  • Time constraints and LLM use significantly altered mental representation characteristics
  • Neither factor significantly changed strategic foresight outcomes
  • LLM use was associated with increased information overload and decreased psychological ownership

Abstract

Strategic foresight—that is, the ability to predict strategic outcomes—depends on how decision-makers represent strategic problems. Time constraints and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly salient factors shaping this process. We study how both jointly affect mental representations and strategic foresight in a startup evaluation task (N = 348). Using a 2 × 2 experimental design, we show that both time constraints and LLM use significantly alter the characteristics of mental representations. Despite these representational shifts, neither time constraints nor LLM use are found to significantly change strategic foresight. Additional analyses indicate, for instance, that LLM use increases information overload and reduces psychological ownership. Our findings can be viewed as a cautionary case for the effectiveness of LLM use in strategic decision-making. Thus, our findings suggest several avenues for future research on LLM use and strategic foresight, particularly regarding the interplay between individual cognitive processes and the contextual factors of strategic decisions. History: Accepted for the Special Issue: Can AI Do Strategy? Funding: This study received partial funding from Freunde und Förderer der TU Bergakademie Freiberg e.V., Faculty of Business Administration at the TU Bergakademie Freiberg.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kanis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585438f7c464f23008826https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2025.0442
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations2001 · 1,338 citations
  2. 2Forecasting Tournaments2014 · 101 citations
  3. 3Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox2021 · 2,366 citations
  4. 4Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence2023 · 1,664 citations
  5. 5Making Management Decisions: the Role of Intuition and Emotion1987 · 1,167 citations