Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This commentary critiques harmonisation of power of attorney laws to prevent financial abuse in older Australians, indicating key challenges.
Ending the abuse of older people in Australia is a national policy priority. Harmonisation of financial enduring power of attorney (FEPOA) legislation is regularly called for to protect against financial elder abuse. A FEPOA is a legal instrument by which an adult appoints one or more people to manage their legal obligations, money and property, particularly during periods of incapacity. Although older Australians are urged to make FEPOAs, and a majority of those over age 65 report having one, these instruments are implicated in an estimated 50%–85% of cases of financial elder abuse. This commentary offers a critical perspective on legislative harmonisation as a policy intervention to prevent financial abuse committed via FEPOA arrangements. We address three main issues. First, we explain several approaches to harmonisation, illustrated with examples from different areas of law‐making, noting that harmonisation is often a slow process that does not achieve uniformity. Second, we argue that deficiencies in knowledge and practices that create risks of financial abuse via FEPOAs will not be cured by harmonisation alone. Third, we highlight that the legislative variation across states and territories provides opportunities for innovation in research. Further investment in high‐quality research is essential to guide effective legislative and compliance strategies to prevent the financial abuse of older people.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ries et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: