This framework shows mass hierarchies in particles, indicating new physics through minimal corrections.
Mass hierarchies and flavor mixing in the Standard Model (SM) depend on many free parameters, and their origin remains unresolved. We propose a hybrid framework in which a discrete generation rule with minimal step √2 is combined with micro-corrections (discrete labels), enabling a chained reconstruction of charged-lepton and quark mass hierarchies with a small parameter set (relative RMS error 4.03×10⁻³). The same mixing rule then provides a unified description of the CKM/PMNS mixing-angle hierarchies, and a data-driven identification shows that, in the quark sector, the necessary correction is localized in the $13$ component. In other words, the other components are already consistent with the rule alone, and only the $13$ entry demands an extra degree of freedom, so absorbing the $13$ residual as the minimal correction is sufficient. Indeed, using only the $13$ residual improves CKM consistency from RMS(|V|)=1.79×10⁻² to 1.09×10⁻⁴. Mapping the residual to a dimension-six effective operator yields a new-physics scale Λ 14.8~TeV (95% CI: [14.796,14.817]~TeV). On the lepton side, the analogous distortion parameter is evaluated via Gaussian Monte Carlo, providing its distribution and confidence intervals, while the correlation with ∑ m_ν is found to be extremely small, | corr|~10⁻³. In addition, embedding the geometric input into a Type-I seesaw and adopting the normal ordering (NO) as the main branch gives ∑ m_ν=0.12067~eV, m_β 0.03171~eV, and, from a phase scan, mββ∈[0.01007,0.03144]~eV (68% CI: (0.01346,0.02906)~eV). Thus the framework ties masses, mixing, absolute neutrino masses, and 0νββ to a single generation rule with minimal corrections, yielding falsifiable predictions in terms of Λ, ∑ m_ν, m_β, and mββ. Since the cosmological upper bound on ∑ m_ν depends on the data combination, our value is allowed by conservative CMB-centered bounds and sits near the boundary for tighter sets including BAO (e.g., Planck 2018 and DESI BAO).{Planck2018,DESI2024_BAO,PDG2025_SumMnu}
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HIROTO IWASAKI (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: