Key result
CRISPR/Cas9 microinjection yields ~80% gene-edited PKP2 pig blastocysts, enabling large animal cardiomyopathy models.
Why the study?
Hereditary arrhythmogenic and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies cause sudden cardiac death in young individuals, but large animal models are needed to investigate disease pathways and develop targeted gene therapies.
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic modification via cytoplasmic microinjection is highly efficient for generating large-animal models of hereditary cardiomyopathies.
Advances preclinical PKP2 cardiomyopathy modeling; leaves open human translation pending further validation.
Hereditary arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are autosomal dominant inherited heart diseases responsible for most cases of sudden cardiac death in healthy people aged younger than 35, specially in young athletes. Modelling these disorders in large animals is expected to serve as an invaluable resource for investigating disease-specific pathways and mutation impacts. Moreover, by facilitating rigorous preclinical testing, it opens avenues for developing targeted gene therapies. We have established a working pipeline for generating genetically modified pig models using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to investigate key cardiac proteins involved in hereditary heart conditions. Specifically, this initiative aims to create large animal models with targeted mutations in the TMEM43, PKP2 and MYBPC3 genes. Our methodology involves maturing oocytes from pig ovaries, followed by in vitro fertilization with Yucatan pig semen. Prior fertilization, oocytes undergo CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic modification via electroporation (EP) or cytoplasmic microinjection (CMI) with Cas9 proteins and specific guide RNAs (gRNAs). Furthermore, we have established the surgical procedures required for embryo transfer. Surrogate sows, prepared through hormonally induced heat cycles, undergo an abdominal laparotomy to insert CRISPR-modified embryos containing PKP2 mutations directly into the oviduct. Post-fertilization viability rates are 33-36%, and development to the blastocyst stage is achieved in 11-12% of cases for EP and 18% for CMI. Among these, CMI has proven the most efficient, particularly for the PKP2 model, where an impressive 80% of blastocysts exhibit successful gene editing. This high success rate marks a significant advance in generating precise and robust large-animal disease models. In our first trial, ultrasound monitoring of the gilt at day 35 post-surgery revealed successful implantation of seven embryonic vesicles in the uterine wall. Although the development of these fetuses was naturally interrupted before they reached term, the implantation of the embryos constituted the first major challenge initially presented by the transfer process. Consequently, we are currently working on improving the pregnancy diagnostics and monitoring of the pregnant sow in future transfers to obtain our first generation of genetically modified piglets after a gestation period of 115 days. By applying cutting-edge gene-editing techniques on pig oocytes, we aim to produce animal models that replicate human cardiac disease pathology with high fidelity, enhancing their translational potential for understanding disease mechanisms and testing new therapies. As such, this work represents a major step toward the implementation of personalized therapeutic strategies in cardiology, bridging the gap between molecular insights and clinical application.Distribution of mutations in blastocysts Ultrasound of developing embryo at 35d
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arevalo et al. (2025) studied Hereditary arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic modification was evaluated on Successful gene editing in blastocysts. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic modification via cytoplasmic microinjection achieved an 80% successful gene editing rate in pig blastocysts for the PKP2 cardiomyopathy model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: