PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Systems4 citationsOpen Access

AI-Mediated Participation and People Sustainability: A Socio-Technical Case Study in Healthcare Shift Scheduling

View Full Paper
DVDaniele VirgillitoCLCaterina Ledda

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how AI-mediated participation in shift scheduling impacts workforce stability and perceptions of fairness.
  • Exploratory case study of a private hospital in Italy
  • Implementation of an AI-enabled shift scheduling system called 'Dream-Shift'
  • Integration of a Nursing Practice Council and HR dashboards for participatory feedback
  • Use of administrative data, ethnographic observations, and informal feedback
  • AI system did not eliminate inequities but revealed decision constraints
  • Redistributed emotional burden of scheduling among staff
  • Facilitated structured conversations about work responsibilities
  • Managers transitioned from unilateral decision-makers to facilitators

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping organizational dynamics, not only through efficiency gains but by influencing how work is structured, interpreted, and experienced. In healthcare, where professional team stability is crucial, this transformation intersects with structural issues such as persistent nurse turnover. This study presents an exploratory case study of a private accredited hospital in Italy that introduced an AI-enabled shift scheduling system (“Dream-Shift”) in response to perceived inequities and workforce instability. The system was embedded in a participatory architecture that included a Nursing Practice Council and HR dashboards to visualize staffing patterns. Drawing on theories of Sustainable Human Resource Management (SHRM), algorithmic management, and people sustainability, the study examines how AI-mediated transparency and participation affect fairness perceptions, predictability, and organizational climate. Using administrative data, ethnographic observations, internal documents, and informal feedback, the study finds that the algorithm did not eliminate all inequities but made decision constraints visible and debatable. It redistributed the emotional burden of scheduling and enabled more structured conversations about work. Managers transitioned from unilateral decision-makers to facilitators of collective interpretation. The results suggest that when integrated into participatory infrastructures, AI can foster organizational transparency, support relational stability, and act as a socio-technical enabler of people sustainability rather than as a tool of control.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Virgillito et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585ea8f7c464f23009bdehttps://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Wearables in Healthcare Organizations: Implications for Occupational Health, Organizational Performance, and Economic Outcomes2025 · 10 citations
  2. 2The Impact of Organizational Dysfunction on Employees’ Fertility and Economic Outcomes2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3The workplace expectations and preferences of Gen Z nurses: exploratory factor analysis2025 · 14 citations
  4. 4The Role of HRM Practices in Shaping a Positive Psychosocial Experience of Employees: Insights from the SCARF Model2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5Social impacts of algorithmic decision-making: A research agenda for the social sciences2022 · 47 citations