Demonstrates cloud-based perception offloading for improved strawberry harvesting productivity.
Purpose This paper presents a cloud robotics architecture for greenhouse strawberry harvesting, designed as a two-phase workflow that decouples perception from actuation. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and scalability of cloud-based perception offloading in structured agricultural environments. Design/methodology/approach In Phase 1, the robot performs single-pass data collection, capturing red, blue, green, and depth images and transmitting them to a cloud server for processing. In Phase 2, harvesting is executed based on cloud-computed localization results. Three models are developed: error propagation for localization accuracy, cloud latency for permissible delays and probabilistic harvest success linking detection, localization and gripping reliability. Findings Experiments confirmed localization repeatability of 0.6 mm root-mean-square within the 11 mm tolerance of the cutter–gripper, harvesting success rates of 97.9% in open/cluttered arrangements and 81.7% in overlapping clusters and average cycle times of 1.6 s per plant for data collection and 7.8 s per fruit for harvesting. Cloud latency tests yielded delays from 1.6 to 13.8 s depending on network condition, validating the latency model. Cost analysis showed that lightweight robots using low-cost processors (e.g. Raspberry Pi 4) can leverage cloud resources, avoiding expensive onboard graphical processing units and enabling scalable multi-robot deployment. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study demonstrates the first integration of single-pass data collection with cloud-based perception offloading for strawberry harvesting. The findings provide a generalizable framework for cloud-integrated service robots, with applicability to other greenhouse crops and broader service robotics domains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baig et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: