PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Exploratory Analysis of Temporal Patterns in Seismic Time Series Using Translation-Invariant Machine Learning

View Full Paper
MCMarcelo Cerda

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore if machine learning can detect consistent patterns in seismic activity over time.
  • Utilized translation-invariant machine learning to analyze seismic time series data.
  • Extracted 63 spatiotemporal features from seismic events of magnitude 3.0 and above.
  • Employed gradient-boosted decision trees (XGBoost) for analysis.
  • Performed strict temporal validation to measure predictive accuracy.
  • Conducted evaluations on significant seismic events in California and New Zealand.
  • Achieved AUC scores of 0.79 for regional and 0.85 for local event predictions.
  • Demonstrated 75.6% event coverage with 48.9 false alarms per year.
  • Successfully flagged the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence 14 days in advance and the 2026 Indio Hills event 13 days prior.
  • Similar performance noted with AUC of 0.829 in New Zealand's Alpine Fault analysis.

Abstract

This exploratory study examines whether a translation-invariant machine learningmethodology can identify non-random temporal patterns in seismic time series. Theframework extracts 63 spatiotemporal features from background activity (M≥3.0) usinggradient-boosted decision trees (XGBoost) to analyze signatures preceding significant events(M≥4.5). Focusing on California’s transform fault environment, strict temporal holdoutvalidation demonstrates discriminative power with AUC scores of 0.79 (regional, 500 km)and 0.85 (local, 200 km). The system achieves 75.6% coverage at 48.9 false alarms per yearin balanced mode (threshold 0.70). Retrospective applications include the 2019 Ridgecrestsequence (M7.1), flagged 14+ days in advance, and the 2026 Indio Hills event (M4.9),detected 13 days prior. A preliminary evaluation on New Zealand's Alpine Fault demonstratedsimilar performance (AUC 0.829), suggesting that similar signals may be detectable intectonically analogous settings. SHAP analysis highlights temporal acceleration and eventrecency as dominant features. This work demonstrates a research pathway for interpretablemonitoring approaches without claiming operational reliability. Keywords: time series analysis, gradient boosting, exploratory study, translation-invariant machinelearning, temporal validation, seismic monitoring, California seismicity, transform fault seismicity,interpretable AI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marcelo Cerda (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586118f7c464f23009fb4https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18487268
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1GeoPredict: Machine Learning Based Earthquake Prediction and Risk Assessment Using Historical Seismic Data2025
  2. 2Spatio-Temporal Regression Modeling of Global Earthquake Magnitudes: A 200-Year Historical Analysis and Predictive Evaluation (1826–2026)2026
  3. 3Machine learning-based ground motion model with finite-fault distance metrics2026
  4. 4Towards a deep learning approach for short-term data-driven spatiotemporal seismicity rate forecasting2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Towards a deep learning approach for short-term data-driven spatiotemporal seismicity rate forecasting2025