Experiments assess fuel preheating effects on combustion efficiency in scramjet models, suggesting injector configuration's dominance.
This work investigates the impact of fuel preheating on combustion in a cavity-based scramjet. A Mach 2.2 vitiated crossflow ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) was used to emulate Mach 5 flight at 21 km. Results from unheated and superheated n-dodecane experiments were compared for wall-normal injection with and without strut assistance. Combustion was studied with pressure and chemiluminescence measurements; mixing was assessed with shadowgraphy and infrared imaging. The overall effect of fuel state was minor for the evaluated strategies. Wall-based injection was characterized by excessive entrainment, rich blowout at globally lean conditions for both cases. In the strut-assisted scheme, both fuel states produced similar behavior: stable choking at [Formula: see text] and intermittent oscillation at [Formula: see text], between strut-wake location and the cavity shear-layer. Preheating the fuel notably affected flame dynamics, reducing the oscillation interval between the stabilization modes. The unheated case exhibited lower flame intensity over the cavity and stronger high-frequency oscillations that could be linked to jet-induced instabilities. Modal and spectral analyses revealed overlap between nonreacting plume dynamics and flame oscillations. These findings emphasize that while fuel preheating can suppress vaporization-driven instabilities, injector configuration remains the dominant factor governing combustion efficiency and flame stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: