Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis uncovers the missing critical evaluations in psychometrics, suggesting improvements for the field.
Psychometrics, the science sustaining psychological test construction and use, has consistently ignored logical criticism of its foundations, even though science as a cognitive enterprise requires criticism. This accumulating corpus of criticisms is generally unacknowledged in histories of the discipline, in textbooks, and in course curricula. Thus, there is a mystery here as to why this critical resource is missing. Considering three critical offerings from before 1950, it is clear that by mid-century, psychometric methods, consistently marketed as instruments of scientific measurement, were bereft of evidence supporting that boast. A solution to this mystery is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joel Michell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: