Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This response to Michell’s article raises three main concerns. First, there is an important yet unexamined relationship between psychology’s reliance on inferential statistics (NHST) and the “missing corpus” of critiques of psychometricians’ a priori assumption that psychological attributes sustain quantitative structure. Second, framing the problem as one of “visible” (NHST) versus “invisible” (measurement) critiques may mask how commitment to NHST drove psychologists to assume measurement is taking place. Finally, Michell fails to account for the role political theory played in explaining the widespread adoption of psychometric methods, sans scientific evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark J. Garrison (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: