PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research0 citations

How Message Framing and Subsidy Design Shape Hearing Health Care Decisions Among Older Adults With Hearing Loss: Evidence From a Mixed-Methods Approach

View Full Paper
HJHaochen JiangYZYuying ZhangJGJiamin Gao

Key Points

  • This research investigates the effects of message framing and subsidy types on the use of hearing health care services by older adults with hearing loss in rural China.
  • Conducted a mixed-methods study combining survey experiments and semi-structured interviews.
  • Quantitative phase involved testing responses to gain/loss-framed messages and different subsidy types.
  • Qualitative phase included in-depth interviews with 68 older adults and family members to explore barriers to service utilization.
  • Loss-framed messages significantly increased willingness for hearing screening (p < .05).
  • In-kind subsidies notably improved willingness for hearing aid uptake (p < .01).
  • Co-payment subsidies discouraged recommendations from family members (p < .05).
  • Interviews identified major barriers like financial constraints and stigma surrounding hearing loss.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine how message framing and subsidy design influence hearing health care (HHC) services utilization among older adults with hearing loss (HL) in rural China. Method: The mixed-methods study used a survey experiment design in the quantitative phase and semistructured interviews in the qualitative phase. A survey experiment tested older adults and their family members' responses to gain-/loss-framed messages and in-kind/co-payment subsidies, followed by in-depth interviews with 68 participants. Results: Loss-framed messages increased hearing screening willingness ( p < .05) more than gain-framed messages, but neither affected hearing aid adoption. In-kind subsidies increased hearing aid uptake willingness ( p < .01), whereas co-payment discouraged family recommendations ( p < .05). The interviews further illustrated key barriers to HHC services, including viewing HL as normal aging, stigma concerns, and financial constraints. Conclusions: Integrating message framing, subsidy schemes, and behavioral intervention strategies is recommended to enhance the uptake of HHC services. Policymakers should use loss-framed messages for hearing screening promotion and provide in-kind subsidies for hearing aid adoption. Equally important are efforts to improve hearing health literacy, alleviate financial constraints, and implement patient-centered decision making in HHC services.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586ad8f7c464f2300a62chttps://doi.org/10.1044/2025_jslhr-25-00460
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper