Screening method reveals flooding risk in transport networks, indicating priorities for flood risk management.
Road-watercourse crossings (RWCs), such as bridges, are critical components of transport networks. Flooding poses a major threat to these structures, with overtopping leading to safety hazards and traffic disruptions. This study presents a large-scale screening method using GIS techniques and remotely sensed data to assess the overtopping potential of RWCs. The approach integrates road and hydrographic networks with high-resolution LiDAR-derived DEMs of bare terrain (DTM) and surface (DSM). RWCs create a constriction of the river runoff cross-section, acting as bottlenecks. The method assumes that RWCs with a height difference between the road level (DSM) and river thalweg (DTM) lower than the corresponding cross-section height are more prone to overtopping. RWCs were identified, and their remotely sensed height was calculated by extracting elevation differences (DSM-DTM). Field measurements were conducted to validate the remotely sensed values. A terrain ruggedness index was used to filter noise in the DSM, assuming roads are the smoothest surfaces. Riverbanks were identified using the raster-based Unsupervised approach, and their height from the thalweg was assessed. The method is applied to the Magra River Basin in Italy (970 km²), a flood-prone area. Results showed that for watercourses with Strahler order < 4, the median error between remotely sensed and field measurements height was high (1.2 m, 35%), while for those with a higher order the error was significantly lower (0.5 m, 8%). Among 230 identified bridges, ~ 25% exhibited a high overtopping potential. This approach enables the prioritization of bridges for further hydrologic-hydraulic and traffic disruption modeling, enhancing infrastructure resilience and flood risk management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amaddii et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: