Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study shows improved neurological recovery in ischemic moyamoya disease with modified bypass, suggesting promising management options.
This retrospective cohort study compared long-term outcomes between modified extracranial-intracranial bypass (mECIC) and encephalo-duro-arterio-myo-synangiosis (EDAMS) in adults with ischemic moyamoya disease. Among 50 patients analyzed (mECIC: n = 18; EDAMS: n = 32), the mECIC group demonstrated better neurological recovery, with 88.9% achieving functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) versus 62.5% in the EDAMS group ( p = 0.018) at 60-month follow-up. Cognitive performance, assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), showed greater improvement in the mECIC cohort (ΔMoCA: +8.2 ± 1.5 vs. + 5.1 ± 1.2 points; p < 0.001), accompanied by more pronounced hemodynamic restoration including higher cerebral blood flow (46.32 ± 6.70 vs. 40.19 ± 5.72 mL/100 g/min; p = 0.003) and greater flow augmentation (ΔCBF: +18.09 ± 9.32 vs. + 12.05 ± 6.77 mL/100 g/min; p = 0.02). The mECIC procedure was associated with longer stroke-free survival (HR = 3.48; p = 0.03). The mECIC revascularization, associated with improved long-term outcomes, may represent a valuable therapeutic approach for the long-term management of ischemic moyamoya disease in adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: