Observational study shows relapse on prednisone predicts high risk of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome in patients, suggesting the need for steroid-sparing agents.
Around half of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome are eventually diagnosed with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent disease. To minimize steroid toxicity, guidelines usually recommend switching these patients to steroid-sparing agents. Unfortunately, morbidity from steroids can be irreversible, and patients may suffer even after steroid discontinuation. This is a multicenter observational study of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. We compared patients that were eventually diagnosed with frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome with those with non/infrequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Additionally, we compared the risk of being diagnosed with frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, between patients with relapse on a prednisone dose equivalent of ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/every other day versus patients with no relapses above this cutoff. Patients who relapsed during induction were more likely to develop frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Patients with ≥ 1 relapse on prednisone equivalent of ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/every other day were 33 times more likely to develop frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome ( p value < 0.001). Patients with one relapse on prednisone equivalent of ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/every other day are at high risk of an eventual diagnosis of frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Further studies are needed to determine whether a single relapse above this cutoff is reliable enough to enable clinicians to switch patients to steroid-sparing agents before meeting formal criteria for frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent disease. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: