PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología4 citationsOpen Access

Keystone roles of carbon-degrading enzyme activities in mediating carbon in soils subjected to straw return: a global meta-analysis

SSSomdee SomchanhYLYue LiLYLing Yang

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effects of straw return on hydrolytic carbon-degrading enzyme activities and their relationship with below-ground carbon dynamics.
  • Synthesis of 211 observations from 68 published field studies worldwide
  • Evaluation of straw incorporation effects on hydrolytic enzyme activities and below-ground carbon
  • Analysis of relationships between enzyme activities and carbon forms in soil
  • Straw return enhanced hydrolytic enzyme activities by 25% on average
  • Increased various carbon forms: dissolved organic carbon by 27%, easily oxidizable carbon by 24%, light fraction organic carbon by 51%, particulate organic carbon by 34%, microbial biomass carbon by 31%, and soil organic carbon by 20%
  • The effect of straw return on enzyme activities decreased with longer experiment duration (≥ 10 years)
  • No clear relationships were found between certain carbon forms and enzyme activities

Abstract

Introduction Straw return exerts a profound impact on soil fertility, with particularly critical implications for soil carbon (C) pools. Soil hydrolytic C-degrading extracellular enzyme activities (Hy-EEAs) play a central role in soil C cycling. However, the effects of straw return on Hy-EEAs, below-ground C dynamics, and the underlying regulatory mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Methods In this study, we evaluated the effects of straw incorporation on Hy-EEAs and below-ground C, as well as their potential relationships, by synthesizing 211 observations from 68 published field studies worldwide. Results On average, straw return significantly enhanced Hy-EEAs by 25% but had no effect on β-xylosidase. Straw return significantly increased dissolved organic carbon, easily oxidizable carbon, light fraction organic carbon, particulate organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and soil organic carbon by 27, 24, 51, 34, 31, and 20%, respectively, compared to the no-straw-return treatment. The effect of straw return on Hy-EEAs decreased with increasing experiment duration (≥ 10 years). Straw return effects on Hy-EEAs increased with the incorporation of straw. The response ratios ( lnR ) of microbial biomass C content and soil organic carbon (SOC) storage to straw return were positively correlated with the lnR of Hy-EEAs; however, no clear relationships were found between the lnR of soil dissolved organic C (DOC), easily oxidizable C (EOC), light fraction organic C (LFOC), and particulate organic C (POC) and the lnR of Hy-EEAs. Discussion These results suggest that straw return stimulation of Hy-EEAs exhibited a key role in regulating below-ground C dynamics. Future biogeochemistry models could incorporate the observed relationships in this study between the soil C pool and Hy-EEAs, which can improve model predictions of C in soils under straw return in agricultural systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Somchanh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988270a0fc35cd7a8845eb3https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1739110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper