Proposes a novel G-KMS that enhances narrative quality in RPGs through LLM integration, suggesting broad applications.
Procedural approaches have long been used in game development to reduce authoring costs and increase content diversity; however, traditional rule-based systems struggle to scale narrative complexity, whereas recent large language model (LLM)-based methods often produce outputs that are structurally invalid or incompatible with real-time game engines. This gap reflects a fundamental limitation in current practice: generative models lack systematic mechanisms for managing executable game knowledge rather than merely producing free-form narrative texts. To address this issue, we propose a Game Knowledge Management System (G-KMS) that reformulates LLM-based narrative generation as a structured knowledge management process. The proposed framework integrates knowledge grounding, schema-governed generation, normalization-based repair, engine-aligned knowledge admission, and application within a unified pipeline. The system was evaluated on a compact 2D Unity-based RPG benchmark using automated structural and semantic analyses, engine-level playability probes, and a controlled human player study. The experimental results demonstrated high reliability in knowledge admission, stable procedural structures, controlled expressive diversity, and a strong alignment between system-level metrics and player-perceived narrative quality, indicating that LLMs can function as dependable knowledge-construction components when embedded within a governed management pipeline. Beyond the evaluated RPG setting, this study suggests a practical and reproducible approach that may be extended to other executable systems, such as interactive simulations and training environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: