Consensus model improves environmental project selection by considering individual semantics, indicating more effective group decisions.
Individual cognitive differences may cause decision makers to interpret the same linguistic terms differently. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel consensus model for large-scale group decision-making by incorporating personalized individual semantics into a probabilistic linguistic preference framework. A normalization method integrating emotional tone is introduced to refine probabilistic linguistic preference relations, and an additive consistency-based semantic optimization model is developed to assign appropriate linguistic terms to decision makers. To promote interaction among those with similar interests, a weighting method based on semantic similarity and a fuzzy clustering algorithm using personalized individual semantics are employed to form subgroups with similar semantics. A consensus-reaching process, including assessment and feedback stages, is then applied to guide decision makers toward agreement. A case study on environmental project selection verifies the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: