A systematic evaluation of MRI preprocessing methods improves brain tumor classification accuracy, suggesting enhanced diagnostic potential.
Brain tumor diagnosis via MRI remains challenging due to imaging artifacts, tumor heterogeneity, and time‐intensive manual evaluations that introduce variability. While preprocessing is critical for accuracy, comparative analyses of techniques are limited, as research often prioritizes algorithmic advancements. This study systematically evaluates five MRI preprocessing methods (CLAHE, Nyul normalization, N4 bias correction, template registration, White Stripe normalization) and proposes a deep learning framework integrating fine‐tuned InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and Xception networks. Features from these models were concatenated, refined via ANOVA and L1max selection, and classified using machine learning. To address class imbalance, data augmentation techniques were employed, ensuring a well‐distributed dataset for robust model training. All preprocessing methods achieved greater than 98% accuracy, with CLAHE outperforming others (99.8% on Dataset 1; 99.61% on Dataset 2) while requiring minimal computational resources. The framework's efficacy is demonstrated through a publicly accessible web platform BTdiagAI, that enables users to upload brain MRI scans for automated classification into four tumor categories: benign, pituitary, glioma, and meningioma. This deployment underscores the clinical applicability of the solution, offering rapid, scalable diagnosis with state‐of‐the‐art accuracy. The study highlights preprocessing as pivotal for MRI‐based tumor diagnosis, advocating CLAHE for its balance of efficiency and performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmmed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: