Reveals enhanced elasticity and reprocessing in biobased elastomers, suggesting a sustainable solution for recycling challenges.
The recycling challenges of thermosetting polymers and the environmental burden from petroleum-based polymers drive the rapid development of recyclable biobased elastomers. However, cross-linked biobased elastomers face an inherent trade-off between high elasticity and high-throughput recycling: robust elastic recovery requires sufficiently cross-linked topologies, whereas efficient reprocessing favors low cross-linking densities. Herein, we address this dilemma by integrating phase separation modulation with dynamic covalent cross-linking to synthesize biobased thermoplastic elastomers via one-step in situ cross-linking. Using maleic anhydride-grafted ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (M-g-EVA) as the compatibilizer, biobased monomers, epoxidized soybean oil (ESO), and dimer acid (DFA) were in situ polymerized within the ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM) matrix to form a vitrimer dispersed phase. During thermal mechanical mixing, M-g-EVA was first selectively predispersed in the EPDM matrix. Subsequent in situ polymerization drives the cross-linked ESO/DFA aggregates to localize within the M-g-EVA phase, creating a distinct third phase. Meanwhile, M-g-EVA forms interfacial cross-linking with ESO and physically entangles with EPDM chains, thus constructing a stable multiphase network composed of a "continuous - interfacial - dispersed phase". The resulting material demonstrates enhanced elastic performance, featuring excellent room-temperature creep resistance (0.00184%/min), improved low-temperature compression set resistance (14% reduction at -25 °C relative to a traditional commercial TPV with similar hardness), and outstanding cyclic fatigue stability (stress retention rate >97% following 300 loading-unloading cycles). Owing to β-hydroxyester bond exchange and lubricating effect of EPDM, the multiphase polymer can be continuously extruded and reprocessed with high flux, retaining >85% of its mechanical property after 5 reprocessing cycles. In short, this study provides a scalable route to high-performance and recyclable biobased elastomers and offers design insights for sustainable elastomers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: