Cross-sectional study evaluates infections in children discharged from the ED with blood cultures, suggesting a need for improved guidelines.
Objective: To evaluate rates of critical illness and significant infection among children discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a pending blood culture. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of children 90 days to 18 years old discharged from one of 37 pediatric EDs between 2016 and 2024 with a complete blood count or C-reactive protein performed. Our primary outcome was a diagnosis of specific bacteremia on representation to the ED within 3 days. Secondary outcomes on 3-day return visit included: (1) sepsis, (2) intensive care unit admission, and (3) receipt of ≥3 days of systemic antibiotics. We evaluated for differences in outcomes based on the performance of a blood culture on the index visit. Results: We included 416,357 discharges (median encounter age 6.3 y, IQR: 2.1 to 12.7). Of these, 229,269 (55.1%) had a blood culture collected. Among encounters with a blood culture, 0.1% (n = 151; 95% CI: 0.1-0.1) had specific bacteremia on return visit. Encounters with a blood culture at the index visit had higher odds of specific bacteremia [odds ratio (OR) 10.86, 95% CI: 5.8-20.34], sepsis (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.88-5.30), intensive care unit admission (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.94-4.12), and ≥3 days of systemic antibiotics (OR: 4.77, 95% CI: 4.17-5.46). Conclusions: Children discharged with a pending blood culture have higher rates of significant bacteremia and other clinically important return visits than children discharged without a blood culture, though absolute rates of these outcomes were low. Improved guidelines are needed to better identify children who require blood cultures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colgan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: