PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation0 citationsOpen Access

In Situ Monitoring Consolidation and Hardening Behaviors of an HDPE Geomembrane‐Cement‐Bentonite Composite Cutoff Wall

View Full Paper
WJWei JinZWZheng‐kai WangNational Development and Reform CommissionXDXiang‐Xian Dou

Key Points

  • The aim is to monitor the consolidation and hardening behaviors of a HDPE-cement-bentonite cutoff wall to understand its performance in contaminant containment.
  • Installed a multi-parameter monitoring system for soil pressure, pore water pressure, and electrical conductivity.
  • Monitored a 23.5-meter deep HDPE-cement-bentonite cutoff wall for 20 days.
  • Analyzed data from different depth zones, identifying changes in suction and pressure behavior.
  • The shallow zone became unsaturated after 2 days, leading to surface settlement and detachment phenomena.
  • 80-kPa suction developed in the intermediate zone by Day 4, indicating pressure dynamics.
  • Bulk electrical conductivity showed overall decrease but varied significantly with surrounding soil permeability.

Abstract

Abstract Vertical cutoff walls are commonly used for containment of contaminants and polluted groundwater. In this paper, an in situ multi‐parameter monitoring system that includes soil pressure, pore water pressure, and bulk electrical conductivity was installed in a 23.5‐m deep HDPE‐cement‐bentonite (HCB) cutoff wall, with the data collected from the first 20 d are presented herein. The shallow zone (≤2.5 m) became unsaturated after 2 d, triggering surface settlement, “CB mixture‐geomembrane” or “CB mixture‐trench sidewall” detachment, and shrinkage cracks; the intermediate zone (5–7.5 m) developed 80‐kPa suction on Day 4, while deeper responses lagged. Lateral pressure showed a V‐shaped trend, that is, initial hydration‐induced drop followed by a pressure increase due to bentonite swelling. Bulk electrical conductivity (3000–4000 mS/m) decreased overall but varied with the permeability of surrounding soil. The temperature evolution comprised three distinct stages: hydration heating, cooling, and stabilization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827a20fc35cd7a8846776https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.70031
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accuracy of Bulk Electrical Conductivity Measurements with Time Domain Reflectometry2008 · 48 citations
  2. 2Effect of bentonite on the stability of fresh cement slurry2021 · 12 citations
  3. 3Advances in HDPE barrier walls1996 · 24 citations
  4. 4Mechanism of Crack Development and Strength Deterioration in Controlled Low-Strength Material in Dry Environment2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5The Strength, Permeability, and Microstructure of Cement–Bentonite Cut-Off Walls Enhanced by Polypropylene Fiber2025 · 5 citations