What question did this study set out to answer?

This article aims to address the absence of an emotional mechanism in the Advocacy Coalition Framework by examining how emotions influence coalition dynamics.

February 8, 2026Policy Studies JournalOpen Access

Emotion and the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Affective Dynamics Perspective

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This article aims to address the absence of an emotional mechanism in the Advocacy Coalition Framework by examining how emotions influence coalition dynamics.
Analyzes coalition membership patterns and emotional influences on policymakers.
Proposes new theoretical concepts like emotional anchoring and affective brokerage.
Examines how emotions influence policy behavior independently of belief alignment.
Identifies that emotional anchoring can influence coalition stability and learning over time.
Suggests that emotions often play a critical role in shaping coalition dynamics and policy outcomes.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

This conceptual article explores emotional dynamics affecting coalition membership in policy subsystems, suggesting significant implications for policy processes.

Cite This Study

Moshe Maor (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827a20fc35cd7a8846820 https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70104

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This conceptual article explores emotional dynamics affecting coalition membership in policy subsystems, suggesting significant implications for policy processes.

Emotion and the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Affective Dynamics Perspective

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Emotion and the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Affective Dynamics Perspective

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study