Key result
ILVA-LSCA transposition, ILVA-LCCA transposition, and ILVA ligation were safe in patients with aortic dissection undergoing TAR with FET, with 0 strokes observed across all 94 patients.
Why the study?
What is the optimal management strategy (ligation vs transposition) for isolated left vertebral artery in patients with aortic dissection undergoing total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk?
Cohort (n=94)
What is the optimal management strategy (ligation vs transposition) for isolated left vertebral artery in patients with aortic dissection undergoing total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ligation, ILVA-LSCA transposition, and ILVA-LCCA transposition are all feasible and safe strategies for managing ILVA in patients with aortic dissection undergoing TAR with FET, though ligation should be avoided in left-dominant vertebral arteries.
Background The presence of an isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) in patients with aortic dissection (AD) is a rare and challenging condition. This study aims to determine the optimal management of ILVA in patients with AD undergoing total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (TAR with FET). Methods This retrospective study enrolled 94 patients with ILVA and AD who underwent TAR with FET. Patients were divided into three groups: 18 patients underwent ligation of ILVA, 52 underwent ILVA- left subclavian artery (LSCA) transposition, and 24 underwent ILVA- left commn carotid artery (LCCA) transposition. Results Vertebral artery dominance was left-dominant in 10.6%, symmetric in 33.0%, and right-dominant in 56.4% of patients. Notably, patients who underwent ligation of ILVA had either symmetric or right-dominant vertebral arteries, with no left-dominant cases. No strokes were observed. Paraplegia/paraparesis, mechanical ventilation time, and long-term survival were comparable among the three groups. Follow-up computed tomographic angiography (CTA) confirmed patency of the left vertebral artery in all patients who underwent ILVA transposition. Conclusions Ligation of ILVA, ILVA-LSCA transposition, and ILVA-LCCA transposition are all feasible and safe strategies for managing ILVA in patients with AD undergoing TAR with FET. However, ligation of ILVA is not recommended for patients with left-dominant vertebral arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Aortic dissection with isolated left vertebral artery (n=94). ILVA-LSCA transposition or ILVA-LCCA transposition vs. Ligation of ILVA was evaluated on Stroke, paraplegia/paraparesis, mechanical ventilation time, and long-term survival. ILVA-LSCA transposition, ILVA-LCCA transposition, and ILVA ligation were safe in patients with aortic dissection undergoing TAR with FET, with 0 strokes observed across all 94 patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: